Outcome
Hold the builder to the brief
On design-and-construct, you get what they document.
You wrote the Principal Project Requirements to describe the building you are buying. On a design-and-construct contract the builder develops the design against it, and the gap between what you specified and what they document is a gap you only discover late - at a design review that runs for an hour, or on site.
CIM reads the builder's drawings and specifications against your Principal Project Requirements, clause by clause, and flags where the design falls short of the brief and where it quietly departs from it, each finding cited to the clause and the drawing.
The conversation happens at design development stage, when a correction is a redraw. Left until construction, the same conversation is a variation and a delay.
Before CIM
- The brief and the builder's design diverge unnoticed.
- Design reviews sample the set rather than read it.
- Shortfalls surface on site, when they are expensive.
With CIM
- The Principal Project Requirements checked against every design issue.
- Departures from the brief cited to the clause and the drawing.
- Corrections made while they are still a redraw.