Feature

OPR vs the drawings

The brief checked against the set, clause by clause.

The Owner's Project Requirements describe the building the contract expects: hundreds of clauses on acoustics, thermal performance, services capacity, finishes, warranties and FFE. On design-build you deliver every one of them whether or not the consultants drew it. CIM checks each clause against the drawings and the specification and cites the sheet behind every finding.

The brief

Hundreds of clauses: acoustics, thermal performance, services capacity, finishes, warranties, FFE.

The set

The drawings and specification as issued, revision by revision.

Checked/Both directions, clause by clause

Every clause is run against the set, and the set is run back against the brief, so the check catches what the design missed and what it added.

Not picked up

A requirement the drawings never showed. Rework at your cost once it is built, so it goes back as an RFI or a qualification.

Past what was asked

Design that runs beyond the brief. Nobody priced it, and it is being built.

The audit re-runs on every design issue, so a clause satisfied at tender is checked again at IFC to the same standard.

The brief and the set, run against each other in both directions, on every issue.

The old way

Hundreds of clauses, checked wherever the brief happens to be open

  • The brief gets read where trouble is expected

    Hundreds of clauses and days to check them all, so the team reads the sections it already suspects and trusts the rest.

  • A missed clause is rework you fund

    On design-build a requirement the drawings never picked up gets built wrong, and the correction comes out of your margin.

  • Over-delivery is built for free

    Design that runs past what the brief asks for goes in, and nobody priced the difference.

With CIM

Every clause checked in both directions, on every issue

  • The whole brief audited against the set

    Each clause runs against the drawings and the specification. Requirements the design missed come back as findings, and so does design that exceeds the brief.

  • Every finding is defensible

    Each one names the clause number and the sheet it was checked against, ready for an RFI or a fee conversation.

  • The obligation stays visible to handover

    The audit re-runs on the bid pack and on every design issue after it, so a clause satisfied at bid is checked again at IFC.

What it does for your team

  • Builders

    The design obligation you carry, visible

    On design-and-construct you are bound to every clause. Each one is checked against the set at pricing and at every issue after it.

  • Developers

    Hold the design to what you briefed

    Requirements the consultants have not picked up come back as findings while the drawings can still change.

  • Certifiers and surveyors

    DA against the construction set

    Discrepancies between what was approved and what is being built, caught before they are built into the job.

Send the brief and the set you're pricing. We'll show you the clauses the drawings missed.

Book a briefing

Find out what your current set is hiding