Compliance code checking
A code compliance report is read sheet by sheet against the building code, under a fee that assumed one pass. CIM reads every drawing, specification and schedule against the clauses that apply - fire, egress, access, energy, structure - and returns each finding cited to the clause and the page. Your team writes the report; the read runs itself.
Trusted by leading Australian builders
“CIM Build pointed to new opportunities to de-risk project documentation and procurement.”
David Chandler OAMFormer NSW Building CommissionerWhere the pressure starts
The hours go into the read, and the fee only pays for one pass
An assessment covers hundreds of sheets across every discipline, and the fee assumed a senior assessor could read them once. Then Rev C lands mid-assessment, the fire engineer's report arrives a week late, and the client wants the code compliance report before the permit deadline. The read gets shorter, the checklist gets longer, and whatever the read misses is found later - by the certifier, at inspection, or after occupation - with your name on the report.
Where it costs you
Hours you cannot bill, findings you cannot defend
A missed clause surfaces at certification as rework inside a fixed fee
The report you signed rests on a read nobody can reproduce
The gap in your risk register
The bottleneck is human review capacity
Every assessment runs to hundreds of sheets, and one assessor reads them against the building code between site inspections and client calls. Then a revision lands and the read starts again. What the read misses leaves the office in a report with your name on it, while capacity stays flat and the fee absorbs every re-read.
Introducing CIM
Every sheet checked against the code in the time it takes to open the set
With CIM, the compliance read is done the hour the set lands. Every issue comes back as findings cited to the clause and the sheet - non-compliances, coordination clashes and unclouded changes - ready to be written into the report or fixed before the set goes out.
Swipe for the next screen
Design risks · L3 fit-out
Drawings read against the specification
Checked 14 Mar
Drawings
- A-301 Rev DLevel 3 plan
- A-501 Rev CWindow schedule
- A-601 Rev DDoor schedule
Specification
- Access cl. 4.2Corridor widths
- Glazing cl. 3.4Glass types by location
- Hardware cl. 5.2Fire door closers
DR-121Corridor at grid C is 3'-9"; spec cl. 4.2 requires 4'-0"A-301 Rev DAccess cl. 4.2Conflict
DR-114Glazing spec cl. 3.4 calls for 10.38 laminated; A-501 schedules 6mm temperedA-501 Rev CGlazing cl. 3.4Conflict
DR-116Door hardware spec cl. 5.2 wants closers on every fire door; A-601 lists 4 withoutA-601 Rev DHardware cl. 5.2Review
Every sheet read against the clauses it touches. Each conflict lands in the register with the sheet and the clause beside it.
A-301 Rev D · Level 3 plan
Grid C · opened from DR-121
Conflict
Corridor width at grid C: 3'-9" measured on the sheet, 4'-0" required by cl. 4.2.
Set read 14 Mar, 08:40 - 3 issues against the specification
Six components.
Built as one.
The whole system
Project intelligence, working as one.
Your models, data, Elements, knowledge, safeguards and delivery connect inside one system. Every revision adds context. Every finding brings the evidence with it.
Every component is already at work. Scroll to explore its role in the whole.
Scroll to explore ↓
Outcomes
Your team writes the report. The read runs itself.
Every sheet read against every applicable clause
The read done in an hour; the team writes the report
Rev C re-read the hour it lands, only the changes flagged
Every finding cited to the clause and the sheet
What the industry says
“CIM Build pointed to new opportunities to de-risk project documentation and procurement. It's pleasing to see how the transformation of construction is accelerating now that the serious players have embraced what good looks like. The days of starting projects with only part documentation are now in the rear view mirror.”
David Chandler OAM
Former NSW Building Commissioner
Why we built CIM
“I've sat through too many design meetings where everyone assumed someone else had checked it. Drawings were technically ‘issued’, procurement moved and the risk only showed up once money was already committed. CIM exists to identify those risks early - before they turn into arguments, delays, or margin erosion.”
Kevin Le
Co-Founder of CIM Build · a decade managing construction projects