
AI-assisted QA
CIM checks every drawing, specification and schedule against each other and against the building code - coordination, spec consistency, fire, egress, access - and returns each finding cited to the sheet it sits on, so your practice issues more work off the same senior hours.
The QA pass today
Sets got bigger. The pass stayed one person and an afternoon
A modern issue runs to hundreds of sheets across every discipline, and the QA pass on it is a senior person with a checklist and the hours left before the deadline. They work the parts of the set they know bite, at the depth the clock allows. What they get to is checked properly. The rest goes out on the strength of their experience, which is the part of your practice you can least afford to spend this way.

Where the hours go
The pass costs senior hours, and still cannot reach the whole set
Every revision starts the pass again from page one
The checks that span the whole set run on the sheets one person can hold
Where the capacity runs out
The bottleneck is human review capacity
Sheet count per issue has climbed for a decade and the QA pass is still one senior person reading between design reviews and client meetings. Their judgement is the scarce thing in the practice, and most of it goes into the mechanical half of the job - cross-referencing schedules, chasing a rating through the set, re-reading a revision from page one.
Introducing CIM
The whole set through QA on every issue, from concept design to issued for construction
With CIM, the whole pass runs on every issue, at the same depth each time. Findings come back cited to the sheet they sit on - a rating specified two ways, a schedule that disagrees with the plan, a duct through a beam - and your team spends its time clearing them.
Swipe for the next screen
Design risks · L3 fit-out
Drawings read against the specification
Drawings
- A-301 Rev DLevel 3 plan
- A-501 Rev CWindow schedule
- A-601 Rev DDoor schedule
Specification
- Access cl. 4.2Corridor widths
- Glazing cl. 3.4Glass types by location
- Hardware cl. 5.2Fire door closers
Every sheet read against the clauses it touches. Each conflict lands in the register with the sheet and the clause beside it.
A-301 Rev D · Level 3 plan
Grid C · opened from DR-121
Corridor width at grid C: 3'-9" measured on the sheet, 4'-0" required by cl. 4.2.
Set read 14 Mar, 08:40 - 3 issues against the specification
Six components.
Built as one.
The whole system
Project intelligence, working as one.
Your models, data, Elements, knowledge, safeguards and delivery connect inside one system. Every revision adds context. Every finding brings the evidence with it.
Every component is already at work. Scroll to explore its role in the whole.
Scroll to explore ↓
Outcomes
Every issue gets the full pass, and your seniors get the day back.
The full set QA'd against itself before it goes out
The ambiguities that generate RFIs, found before issue
Every change between issues flagged, dated and cited
A dated QA record behind every statement you sign
What the industry says
“CIM Build pointed to new opportunities to de-risk project documentation and procurement. It's pleasing to see how the transformation of construction is accelerating now that the serious players have embraced what good looks like. The days of starting projects with only part documentation are now in the rear view mirror.”

David Chandler OAM
Former NSW Building Commissioner
Why we built CIM
“I've sat through too many design meetings where everyone assumed someone else had checked it. Drawings were technically ‘issued’, procurement moved and the risk only showed up once money was already committed. CIM exists to identify those risks early - before they turn into arguments, delays, or margin erosion.”

Kevin Le
Co-Founder of CIM Build · a decade managing construction projects