CIM Build launches Schedule Creator

Design documentation QA

Your clients read your drawings with AI now

General contractors review incoming sets with AI, and the findings come back cited to your page numbers. CIM reads your set the same way - drawings against specifications, each discipline against the others, this revision against the last - an hour before you issue.

Trusted by leading Australian builders

Balmain & CoRenascentUrban CoreBadge ConstructionNorth Construction & BuildingAustralian FCGTaylor ConstructionBalmain & CoRenascentUrban CoreBadge ConstructionNorth Construction & BuildingAustralian FCGTaylor ConstructionBalmain & CoRenascentUrban CoreBadge ConstructionNorth Construction & BuildingAustralian FCGTaylor Construction
“CIM Build pointed to new opportunities to de-risk project documentation and procurement.”
David Chandler OAMFormer NSW Building Commissioner

Where the exposure starts

Every design professional issues under the same pressure

Architectural, structural and services are drawn by different people, often in different offices, against a schedule that assumes somebody reconciled them. In practice that reconciliation is a senior person overlaying sheets by eye in the hours before issue, on the disciplines they thought to check. What that read misses leaves the office, and comes back as somebody else's finding with your page number on it.

Commercial manager pressing his temples while staring at a screen

Where it costs you

Unpaid work, issue after issue

Gaps in your set come back as RFIs you answer for free

Someone else's change becomes a redraw inside your fee

The compliance statement you signed rests on an undocumented review

The gap in your risk register

The bottleneck is human review capacity

Every issue runs to hundreds of sheets across every discipline, and one senior person reads them between design reviews and client meetings. What that read misses leaves the office and comes back as RFIs and redraws you absorb into the fee, while review capacity stays flat and your margin covers the difference.

Introducing CIM

Documentation risk, managed from concept design to issued for construction

CIM BuildCIM.BUILD

Design risk register

3 gaps · trades not yet bought out
DR-102Awning steel shown on arch, absent from structural setRFI before award
DR-108Kitchen exhaust riser undocumented above L2Scope gap flagged
DR-115Guardrail fixing detail missing - added to package scopeScoped into package

Every gap lands in the register before procurement - qualified, RFI'd or scoped into the package.

Seven floors, built to house your project intelligence.

What your estimators priced, what your team assumed and every revision since all live in here. The stack runs on its own, on every revision that lands, and brings your team what it finds. Keep scrolling - the tower comes apart floor by floor.

Outcomes

What leaves your office has already been checked.

What the industry says

“CIM Build pointed to new opportunities to de-risk project documentation and procurement. It's pleasing to see how the transformation of construction is accelerating now that the serious players have embraced what good looks like. The days of starting projects with only part documentation are now in the rear view mirror.”
David Chandler OAM

David Chandler OAM

Former NSW Building Commissioner

Why we built CIM

“I've sat through too many design meetings where everyone assumed someone else had checked it. Drawings were technically ‘issued’, procurement moved and the risk only showed up once money was already committed. CIM exists to identify those risks early - before they turn into arguments, delays, or margin erosion.”
Kevin Le

Kevin Le

Co-Founder of CIM Build · a decade managing construction projects

Start checking your set before your client does