
Design documentation QA
Your clients read your drawings with AI now
Main contractors review incoming sets with AI, and the findings come back cited to your page numbers. CIM reads your set the same way - drawings against specifications, each discipline against the others, this revision against the last - an hour before you issue.
Where the exposure starts
Every consultant issues under the same pressure
Architectural, structural and services are drawn by different people, often in different offices, against a schedule that assumes somebody reconciled them. In practice that reconciliation is a senior person overlaying sheets by eye in the hours before issue, on the disciplines they thought to check. What that read misses leaves the office, and comes back as somebody else's finding with your page number on it.

Where it costs you
Unpaid work, issue after issue
Someone else's change becomes a redraw inside your fee
The compliance statement you signed rests on an undocumented review
The gap in your risk register
The bottleneck is human review capacity
Every issue runs to hundreds of sheets across every discipline, and one senior person reads them between design reviews and client meetings. What that read misses leaves the office and comes back as RFIs and redraws you absorb into the fee, while review capacity stays flat and your margin covers the difference.
Introducing CIM
Documentation risk, managed from concept design to issued for construction
Design risk register
3 gaps · packages not yet letEvery gap lands in the register before procurement - qualified, RFI'd or scoped into the package.
Under the hood
How Construction Intelligence Management Is Built
Seven floors, built to house your project intelligence.
What your estimators priced, what your team assumed and every revision since all live in here. The stack runs on its own, on every revision that lands, and brings your team what it finds. Keep scrolling - the tower comes apart floor by floor.
Outcomes
What leaves your office has already been checked.
The full set read against itself before it goes out
The ambiguities that generate RFIs, found before issue
Every change between issues flagged, dated and cited
Compliance checked against what you actually drew
What the industry says
“CIM Build pointed to new opportunities to de-risk project documentation and procurement. It's pleasing to see how the transformation of construction is accelerating now that the serious players have embraced what good looks like. The days of starting projects with only part documentation are now in the rear view mirror.”

David Chandler OAM
Former NSW Building Commissioner
Why we built CIM
“I've sat through too many design meetings where everyone assumed someone else had checked it. Drawings were technically ‘issued’, procurement moved and the risk only showed up once money was already committed. CIM exists to identify those risks early - before they turn into arguments, delays, or margin erosion.”

Kevin Le
Co-Founder of CIM Build · a decade managing construction projects