Outcome
Win more tenders
Price with fewer unknowns. Qualify the rest.
Every tender you submit commits the business to a number. When the set it's priced on has gaps - peripheral scope, a spec conflict, a note buried on page 47 - that exposure doesn't surface until it's yours to carry. You're up against builders pricing the same incomplete set, and the one who misses the most tends to win the job they'll lose money on.
CIM reads the full tender pack in under an hour - drawings against specs, schedules against drawings, prior revisions against the current set - and returns every gap and conflict cited to the source page. Your team prices what's actually there, and the ambiguity that can't be priced goes back to the client as an RFI or a qualification.
And the same review runs on every tender, whichever estimator it lands with. You put the company's name to more work with less riding on who happened to catch what - and win the jobs you can actually deliver on.
Before CIM
- Scope gaps surface after the number's committed - and they're yours to carry.
- How deep the review goes depends on which estimator had time.
- Ambiguity gets a guess baked into the price, or missed entirely.
With CIM
- Gaps and spec conflicts surfaced before you submit, cited to the page.
- The same rigorous read on every tender.
- What can't be priced goes to the client as an RFI or qualification.